<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No NaNoWriMo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dummies-for-destruction.co.uk/random/2009/11/no-nanowrimo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dummies-for-destruction.co.uk/random/2009/11/no-nanowrimo/</link>
	<description>Dummies For Destruction - A drop of blood in a sea of piss</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.dummies-for-destruction.co.uk/random/2009/11/no-nanowrimo/comment-page-1/#comment-165451</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dummies-for-destruction.co.uk/random/?p=6577#comment-165451</guid>
		<description>I agree that taking chances is an excellent thing, and even that lowering expectations can have a positive effect - that&#039;s partly why I&#039;ve taken it up this year, a) to give myself the kick up the arse required to start writing again and b) to see what happens if I &#039;suppress the inner editor&#039; (as naNoWriMo puts it) which is totally against my nature to do.

My issue with the event is the word count obsession. I attended the kick-off metting of our local group and much of the talk was around joining the &#039;Word Wars&#039; competition, where groups with the most amount of words win. There seems to be an unhealthy obsession with the number of words written, and very little interest in the *quality* of what&#039;s written, and I&#039;m afraid that doesn&#039;t interest me in the least.

I&#039;m taking part and giving it a go, but if I get further into November and think I may have started writing something that&#039;s actually worthwhile, i&#039;ll pull out of the event and continue writing at my pace, rather than the pace (and word count) dictated to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that taking chances is an excellent thing, and even that lowering expectations can have a positive effect &#8211; that&#8217;s partly why I&#8217;ve taken it up this year, a) to give myself the kick up the arse required to start writing again and b) to see what happens if I &#8216;suppress the inner editor&#8217; (as naNoWriMo puts it) which is totally against my nature to do.</p>
<p>My issue with the event is the word count obsession. I attended the kick-off metting of our local group and much of the talk was around joining the &#8216;Word Wars&#8217; competition, where groups with the most amount of words win. There seems to be an unhealthy obsession with the number of words written, and very little interest in the *quality* of what&#8217;s written, and I&#8217;m afraid that doesn&#8217;t interest me in the least.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m taking part and giving it a go, but if I get further into November and think I may have started writing something that&#8217;s actually worthwhile, i&#8217;ll pull out of the event and continue writing at my pace, rather than the pace (and word count) dictated to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QE</title>
		<link>http://www.dummies-for-destruction.co.uk/random/2009/11/no-nanowrimo/comment-page-1/#comment-165450</link>
		<dc:creator>QE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dummies-for-destruction.co.uk/random/?p=6577#comment-165450</guid>
		<description>I mostly disagree (not entirely, granted, but mostly).
Their emphasis in that quote is very unfortunate and I may be some way from the party line, but I always felt that the intention was you shouldn&#039;t feel you need to spend time planning, not that you weren&#039;t allowed to do so. To write with lower expectations and hence take some risks is very good practice, as is the timed challenge itself: it can still be valuable to write something even if it isn&#039;t worth anyone else reading.

Your own reasons for not taking part are fair enough but I think you&#039;re being a bit harsh on the event in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly disagree (not entirely, granted, but mostly).<br />
Their emphasis in that quote is very unfortunate and I may be some way from the party line, but I always felt that the intention was you shouldn&#8217;t feel you need to spend time planning, not that you weren&#8217;t allowed to do so. To write with lower expectations and hence take some risks is very good practice, as is the timed challenge itself: it can still be valuable to write something even if it isn&#8217;t worth anyone else reading.</p>
<p>Your own reasons for not taking part are fair enough but I think you&#8217;re being a bit harsh on the event in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

