Living with Terrorism

Over Christmas there was yet another terrorist “attack” in a plane over the US. And as a result, Fuhrer Brown has said that full-body scanners will be brought in to all the main UK airports because ‘they’re crucial in the fight against terrorism”. Which, frankly, is bollocks – the experts don’t even agree that the explosives used by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on Christmas Day would be found by a full-body scanner.

I’ve written before about Security Theatre, and really this is all more of the same.

What makes me really laugh though is all the shite that politicians spout about doing this “because we won’t give in to terrorism”.

  • Every single time you take a flight and have to take your shoes off for a search, terrorism caused it.
  • Every time you go through a full-body search from now on, that’s been caused by terrorism.
  • Any time you can’t take a drink or shampoo abroad, that’s been caused by terrorism.
  • Any time you read about ID cards or airport security, that’s been caused by terrorism.

And actually, for pretty much all the above items, you could replace “caused by terrorism” with “caused by the threat of terrorism”. Because most of it isn’t actually related to terrorist acts – it’s related to “plots”, rather than the real thing.

Basically, if you’re travelling by plane, you’re affected by terrorism or the threat of it. Every time you’re affected, you think about why you’re being affected. And bang, terrorism wins yet again.

In fact, the only recent occasion where terrorism really hasn’t affected things (yet, anyway) was the bombings in London on the 7th July. Certainly that event has made people more aware of the risk of terrorism and suicide bombers – but it hasn’t involved extra security checks, or changes to the way we live.

So wittering on about not letting terrorists win, while adding in new pointless security measures “to prevent terrorism”, that’s terrorism winning its case.


4 Comments on “Living with Terrorism”

  1. Lionel says:

    Isn’t it convenient that whenever the government’s ready to introduce new security measures that there’s a foiled plot or failed attack to reduce the public’s resistance to the idea …

  2. lyle says:

    Yep, if you were more cynical you might even believe that a lot of the “plots” were there to just sell more security machines etc.

    But that’d be really cynical.

  3. Blue Witch says:

    They’re all barking up the wrong tree though.

    Think of the ethnic profile of those who work airside and see where the *real* risk to security comes from…

  4. lyle says:

    That’s what I mean by Security Theatre, BW – it’s all aimed towards making people feel “safer”, but at the same time fails because it involves making them think about terrorism all the time.

    And none of it actually does anything to prevent the attempts.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *