28
Jul '10

Speed Cameras

   Posted by: lyle   in 1BEM, Cynicism, Driving, People, Politics, Thoughts

It’s currently looking like one of the victims of this new political Age of Austerity (AKA The”Can we cut it? Yes, we can!” years) will be the funding for speed-cameras. Sorry, ‘safety cameras’.

So far Oxfordshire is one of the first to say they’ll be turning the fixed cameras off, which will save them some £600,000 a year.

I have to say that I really don’t have an issue with this – I think that getting rid of the cameras will (in most cases) actually make the roads a bit safer. Yes, there are rat-runs where people are stupid and drive too fast – but in my experience, speed cameras cause far more dangerous driving than they prevent.

One prime example of this is the A11/A14 around Cambridge (and I think I’ve written about this before) – the intersection where they join has a speed camera just after it. I’ve seen far too many near-accidents at that point, where people have been feeding in just fine from the A11 at 70mph(ish) and then have to slap the brakes on because the people in front of them have dropped from 70mph to 50mph to get past the camera.  Yes, it’s down to human stupidity to drop to 50mph – 70mph is fine for going past that particular camera – but it’s still a much more dangerous junction because of the speed camera.

You see the same thing all over the place – people suddenly slowing from an already-legal speed, just to “make sure” they don’t get done by the camera.

So yeah, I think that getting rid of the cameras might just be an improvement to road safety in general, rather than a detriment to it.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 28th, 2010 at 16:20 and is filed under 1BEM, Cynicism, Driving, People, Politics, Thoughts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 comments so far

 1 

I haven’t actually understood this when I’ve heard it on the news – the speed cameras generate a lot more income than they cost to run.

The only ones that work are the average speed ones. And yes, like you, I’ve seen *far* too many near-misses caused by the 100mph brigade slamming on the anchors just before a yellow box.

But, I have heard that there will be many more mobile ones instead. I suspect there will be a huge rise in people buying those expensive bleepy gadgets that spot them for you…

Many thanks for your help with my large problem :)

July 28th, 2010 at 18:06
lyle
 2 

Yeah, I suspect that history will declare this next time period as “The Age of Short-term thinking” and/or “Decade of unplanned cuts”

July 28th, 2010 at 19:13

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment