Posted: Tue 4 May, 2004 Filed under: General Leave a comment »
Ratings
I’m sure that this comes under “Geekery Unlimited”, but is it only me who finds the Guardian’s “overnights” fascinating reading? (It may need you to register for the Grauniad’s services, but that’s still free) Basically it’s a daily view of who watched what last night on the five terrestrial channels, and I find I read it probably three or four times a week, even for programmes I haven’t watched.
Yes, I think it’s now certain that I really do need to get out more.
Posted: Tue 4 May, 2004 Filed under: General Leave a comment »
Photographica
Following on from the post over the weekend about Sulham Woods, I’ve uploaded some photos from the weekend. Enjoy.
Posted: Tue 4 May, 2004 Filed under: General Leave a comment »
Gay Chorus
Further to Peter‘s comments in this post, and his own thoughts on the subject (Jesus, this is getting all insular and self-referential, isn’t it?) I’ve ended up posting the following comment. There’s a lot more that still wants to be said, but my brain’s currently not stringing the words together overly well on the rest of it.
I agree that the idea of a gay chorus is somewhat segregationist. I know that the argument that’s been thrown about previously when people have said “why is there a *insert specialist section* *insert occupation* group, when there’s not a straight/white/whatever one?” The answer that made most (although still not a lot) sense was that the straight/white/whatever ones had been around for years/decades (the particular context I’m thinking of was about a Miss Black America, a beauty contest for African-Americans (I hate that phrase too)) and had already proved themselves to be segregationist.
However, just because “it’s already been done the other way” doesn’t make it right. I’ve never understood the entire ghettoisation process (is that a word?) where there are areas such as Manchester’s Gay Village – I can understand the need for an area where people can feel safe, but in an ideal world, that shouldn’t be necessary either. But so many of the gay men I know refuse to drink anywhere that’s not in “the Gay village”, which to me just limits the opportunities to get out and have fun.
Unfortunately, Man is a tribal beast, and appears to want to only socialise with “his own kind”, to the exclusion of anyone who doesn’t fit that particular emotional/psychological/sexual template. Pack instinct, it still rules.
As a final point, I’d just like to say that I thoroughly enjoyed the performance, not because of their orientation, but because of their talent and enjoyment of the music they were performing. At the end of the day, that’s what matters, not what they do, or what they are – so long as they’re singers and performers (in this context) that is the be-all and end-all.
Bill Bailey – Part Troll
Lowry Lyric Theatre, Salford
Posted: Mon 3 May, 2004 Filed under: General, Reviews(ish) Leave a comment »
I got lucky with this gig – The Lowry had already sold out two shows for Bill Bailey, and I thought I’d missed out. However, he ended up doing an extra gig, tonight, a new “first night”. Impressively, this one was sold out too, but the difference was that this time, I’d got a ticket.
The Lyric is a lovely little theatre – I’m not sure how many people it holds, but it’s probably around the 750-1,000 mark. But at least it’s comfortable, and affords some legroom for lanky sods like me. So that’s a plus point already.
The concert itself was superb. I’d not seen Bill Bailey before, other than on his TV appearances, but he’s absolutely worth every penny. It was absolutely brilliant – and also left me wondering how much of it was pure ad-libbing, working on reactions from the audience. But also anyone who manages to get away with lines like “contains more evil than an Al-Qaeda suggestion box”, waffles on about a combination of Hitler and the hokey-cokey, does the Portishead version of “Zippety Doo Dah”, and then can also tell a joke based around a bar, which has a theme of “Uncertainty”. Yes, Werner Heisenberg is the bar-tender. A very odd combination of surreal humour and deeply intelligent esoteric knowledge. And absolutely hilarious. I needed a gig like this, and it came through in spades.
The Part Troll tour is on between now and the middle of July. If it comes anywhere near you, and it’s not already sold out, go. It’ll be well-worth your time.
Posted: Sat 1 May, 2004 Filed under: General Leave a comment »
Day Out
Well, this weekend I’m in Reading. Lucky me. Actually, its been nice so far – spent most of the morning in Sulham Woods (no decent links, but I’ve got shedloads of photos, so they’ll be online after the weekend), among the bluebells and so on. Very pleasant.
And tonight we went out for the debut public performance of the Reading Gay Chorus – who, for a debut performance, were simply stunning. Not a bad day at all…
Posted: Fri 30 April, 2004 Filed under: General Leave a comment »
Getting away with it
Ah, another case of Do as I say, not as I do – Manchester Police’s Assistant Chief Constable (the one in charge of traffic, no less) gets stopped for doing 104mph on a motorway, and gets away with 6 points and a £450 fine. Alright for some, isn’t it?
Posted: Fri 30 April, 2004 Filed under: General Leave a comment »
Chris Rea
Manchester Apollo
Some people just get confused. As we were leaving the gig, someone behind me said
“Why didn’t he play ‘Lady in Red’ ?”
Sorry, pet, wrong Chris.
However, if you knew what you were looking for, this gig was bloody good. Bizarrely, it was my second all-seated gig within 10 days, after donkey’s years without one at all.
A few years ago, Rea was diagnosed with cancer, and allegedly “did a deal with God”, and decided that if he survived, he’d play the music he wanted to, and do blues albums instead of some of the pap he’d done previously. The first two thirds of the gig was exactly that – proper “old-fashioned” blues, like a supercharged bar-room band. Seriously good blues and rock’n’roll type music.
The last third was more a revue of his older stuff, “Let’s Dance”, “Road to Hell”, “Josephine”, and the like, but even then they’d been bluesed-up (if that’s a word) and a lot better than they’d been remembered.
All things considered, a bloody good gig – much enjoyed. And thank fuck, no “Lady In Red”.


