Mince Pies
Posted: Sat 29 September, 2007 Filed under: Cynicism, Festering Season Leave a comment »
Yesterday, while stood in a queue at the Marks and Spencers food store at Cambridge Railway Station, I noticed that they had mince pies on the shelves. In September. Hell, the “use by” date was the end of October.
The garden centres we use have been stocking up on Festive Tat, and their Christmas departments both open next weekend. Yes, October 5th/6th.
It’s going to be a long three months…
Self Defence
Posted: Thu 27 September, 2007 Filed under: Cynicism, Domestic, Thoughts 3 Comments »Apparently, Jack Straw wants to overhaul the self-defence laws, and “eliminate the grey areas in the law”. Personally, I have no problem with this, and fully agree that it needs doing.
However, rather than simply clearing things up, I personally would opt for the following:
Anyone who breaks into your house absolves all their personal rights at that point
In other words, anyone breaking in accepts responsibility for their actions, and has no personal rights once they’ve broken in, and the householder can take reasonable action to protect their property.
Works for me, anyway.
172mph
Posted: Mon 24 September, 2007 Filed under: Cynicism, Thoughts 4 Comments »I find that I’m completely infuriated by the 10-week jail sentence handed down today to the man clocked at 172mph in Oxford – the fastest speed recorded by the UK police. Now OK, he also got banned from driving for three years, and will have to take an extended driving test before he’s allowed back on the road – but all the same, is it really a fitting punishment?
Personally, I don’t think so. Particularly when you see that most of the media are focussing on just the 10-week jail sentence, which makes it look like that’s all that the stupid git got.
Now, if I were caught speeding at over 100mph, I’d fully expect to be given a ban, and a big fine. If it were significantly over that 100mph, I’d expect either a *huge* ban, *huge* fine, and potentially jail. After all, I know the speed limit, and if I insist on not “just” breaking it, but smashing it completely, then that’s my choice and I have to accept the consequences.
But a 10 week jail sentence? It’s not exactly a significant deterrent, is it? Particularly when you think that with parole, the twat will be out in five or six weeks. The three-year ban is more of a deterrent, but it’s not really any more than he’d have got for speeding at, for example, 110mph. I don’t know, maybe I’m missing something – but the entire sentence just seems a bit paltry for the speed, and size of the offence.
Cost-cutting
Posted: Fri 21 September, 2007 Filed under: Cynicism, News, Thoughts 1 Comment »This story about two Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) who stood by while a child drowned ‘because they weren’t trained for it’ goes to illustrate (yet again) an oft-repeated question- Just what use are PCSOs, anyway?
In short, they’re no flamin’ use at all. They don’t have powers of arrest, they can’t stop and search. Really all they are is extra bodies that count towards “police presence”- without being able to do anything that’s actually useful. Except, I suppose, from directing people to the nearest police station in order to report a crime.
“Observant”
Posted: Fri 21 September, 2007 Filed under: Customer Services, Cynicism 2 Comments »I’ve been using online banking for years now. I look at it at least every couple of days, and keep a fairly close eye on what’s coming in and out of the account, which means I also look at the online statement on a regular basis.
A lot of the transaction details start off with four numbers, something like “8217 iTunes”. I’d never really paid attention to them, just figuring that it was some kind of bank code. In a way I was right.
You see, I’ve just figured out what those numbers actually are.
Recently, the bank sent me an updated Switch/Maestro card- nice of them, considering I hadn’t asked for it- which (obviously had a different 16-digit number on the front to the one I already had.
Yes, the four numbers on the bank statement are the last four on the card. Turns out I’d forgotten to update the card details on my iTunes account, so the old card (which should’ve been “immediately cancelled once I started using the new one”, according to my fuckwit bank) was used when I downloaded some music from them. And lo, the old card’s four numbers are listed against iTunes.
Clever, innit?
21+
Posted: Thu 20 September, 2007 Filed under: Customer Services, Cynicism Leave a comment »In light of this ridiculous story where a 71 year old man was refused alcohol “because he wouldn’t confirm he was over 21 when asked”, I wonder how long it will be before someone else comes forward and says “I’m 16, and the same store let me buy alcohol”?