It’s Coming…

ScroogeTonight, “The X-Factor” returns to Saturday Night TV. “Oh joy, oh happiness, oh bliss” etc. etc. in a suitably sarcastic tone of voice.

Not just a celebration of lip-syncing, unoriginality, freakshow auditions and an almost terminal lack of talent (in the presenters and judges as well as competitors) it’s also the first sign that yes, the Festering Season is soon(ish) to be upon us.

Fucking Hell, 2009’s going past fast…


Gold Scam

Sometimes, adverts on daytime TV are worthy of comment and/or incredulity. Today’s example covered both in one thirty-second slot.

It was an advert for some kind of “Money for your gold” organisation – yes, they had a web address on-screen, but I’m not going to promote the scam any more than I have to.

Anyway, the basic premise was as follows :

  1. Contact us, we’ll send you a “Free” postal packet insured for up to £2,500
  2. Send us your gold
  3. We’ll send you a valuation on it
  4. If you accept it, we’ll send you the cash.
  5. If you don’t, we’ll send you back your gold. (Honest, guv)

Now that just screams “Scam” to me – there’s so many healthy options for “lost in the post” excuses, plus (even if it’s legit) a nice little side-earner if one were to (for example) pawn the gold,have cash for it – always more than the “valuation” – and it’s in your account ’til you have to pay it to either the customer or back to the pawn-shop.

I’m tempted to see if the company directors are Derek and Rodney Trotter…


Most Burgled

The story today about the “most burgled postcodes” in the UK makes for some interesting reading – but also misses out on a couple of rather relevant bits of information.

Firstly, it’s been done by MoneySupermarket.com (I’m not adding a link to them, because they’ve had enough PR out of this already) based on people trying to get home insurance. There’s no corroboration of these figures with any police reports etc.

Secondly, it’s this (from the story)…

Some 0.42% of people from Arnold who asked for quotes via the website said they had been burgled in the past five years, while that rate was above 0.24% in the rest of the top 20.

So 0.42% of people in Arnold (Nottinghamshire) have been burgled in the past five years.  But that means that 99.58% of people in Arnold haven’t been burgled. Which (to me, anyway) is far more interesting, and actually helps to put all this shit in perspective a bit.


Pseudo-Activism

If you’re a regular user of Twitter or Facebook, you can’t avoid seeing ‘campaigns’ of one sort or another. Facebook has infinitely more of them – there seems to be a campaign for everything from “Bring back Smarties in round tubes” to “Free [name person of choice here]”

Twitter ‘campaigns’ seem to be more about changing your ID picture. They went green in support of Iranian elections earlier, and now there’s one about Freeing Gary Mckinnon that adds a “Free Gary” (as opposed to charging for him, one supposes) bar to the Twitter avatar.

Personally, I don’t get involved in these campaigns at all. If I wanted to do so, I’d go to something like the ePetitions section at Number 10 (Not that they get any more attention, but at least it’s being done in the right place) rather than the frankly pointless ones elsewhere.

Because the thing is, Facebook et al may be “the voice of the people”, but governments and (in general) businesses don’t really give a shit about what people say. There are exceptions to the rule, of course – such as Cadbury’s bringing back the Wispa bar – but there’s no way they’d have done that without the expectation of making a significant amount of profit out of it.

Iran didn’t give a shit about how many people’s Twitter icons went green. Number 10 didn’t give a shit about the anti-war protests and marches.

Facebook et al like these campaigns, because they add to the marketing profile of the people who sign up for them. That’s it. You sign up to these things – say, “Bring back Smarties” and Rowntrees will start to know how many people extra might buy a “limited edition” round Smarties tube, and thus make profit for them.

And that’s all it is.


Think 25 – A response

I emailed Sainsbury’s yesterday, asking about why they’d introduced the Think 25 policy.  This is what I (eventually) got back…

Thank you for your email asking why we have adopted the think 25 policy for the sale of alcohol.

Although there has been no change in the law for buying and selling alcohol, the policy is promoted by local authorities, health departments and the police to limit the consequences of selling alcohol to underage people.  As cashiers now have a personal responsibility by law they must take this very seriously.

I am grateful for you taking the time to write to us and allowing me to explain the background to the policy.

So – despite all their waffle about it being related to ‘all age-related items’, it’s actually only related to the sale of alcohol.  And it doesn’t actually explain why they can’t just check for ID that the purchaser is, you know, over 18.

In short, “Think 25” is utter, utter bollocks.  What a shocker.


New Speaker

I notice in the hustings for the new Speaker for the House of Commons, Ann Widdecombe said

the next Speaker had to be “known” to voters, and had to be someone ‘trusted’ by the public

So – not a politician, then?


Airport “Security”

I’ve always been fascinated by the entire “security theatre” thing since 11/9  (Sorry, 9/11)  and this article goes some way to showing some of why I find it so interesting.

What’s security theatre? It’s the farcical measures that’ve been thrown up – particularly in airports – since the 9/11 terrorist attacks. They’re not about security, they’re about making people think they’re secure – and it’s all pretty farcical when you think about it.

Bruce Schneier has been a critic of airport security and the security hype for a long time now – he’s a security and cryptography expert, who’s written some very cool stuff over the years, and knows what he’s talking/writing about. He’s quoted throughout the article, and makes far more sense than anything that the TSA and associated agencies can come up with.

All told, it’s a well-written piece, and well worth reading.